IEEE SLT 2026 Challenge

BeTraC

Beyond Transcription Challenge

End-to-end audio models hallucinate nearly every clinical claim they generate. Can we fix that?

🤗 Access Dataset on Hugging Face Baseline Code on GitHub Register Your Team Join Community on Zulip Learn More →

8,800 conv.

Total Conversations

~1,329 hrs

Total Audio

~9 min

Avg. Duration

Competition Tracks

Ambient Sound Classes

Sample Conversation

2 speakers ambient noise

0:00

—

↗ Listen to a sample conversation from the dataset

About

The Challenge

Generating clinical notes directly from audio — skipping transcription — is faster, cheaper, and avoids cascading ASR errors. But today's end-to-end models hallucinate at alarming rates: on the Synth-DoPaCo dataset, 99–100% of their clinical claims are unsupported by the source audio, compared to just 21–23% for traditional transcribe-then-summarize pipelines. BeTraC is a shared evaluation challenge to close this gap — building end-to-end speech models that are actually faithful enough to trust in healthcare.

Tracks

Competition Tracks

Both tracks require open-weight models only and share the same constraint: no intermediate transcription.

Lightweight Track

≤ 6B (Total) Parameters

✓ Open-weight models up to 6B parameters (see rules for how to count!)
✓ Direct E2E audio-to-SOAP pipeline
✗ No tool use or agentic pipelines
✗ No intermediate transcription at any stage
Baseline: Qwen2.5-Omni-3B

Heavyweight Track

≤ 36B (Total) Parameters

✓ Open-weight models up to 36B parameters (see rules for how to count!)
✓ Tool use & agentic architectures allowed
✓ Chain-of-thought agents, RAG pipelines
✗ No intermediate transcription at any stage
Baseline: Best of Qwen2.5-Omni-3B / Qwen3-Omni-30B variants

Participation Rules

Rules

Hard Constraints Ineligible if violated

✗No intermediate transcription passed between separate models or pipeline components, including as tool outputs. The final model's chain-of-thought is unconstrained in form, but the model must not have been trained to produce a transcript of the audio as a CoT target. See full CoT rule.
✗Open-weight models only. Proprietary API-based models (GPT-4o, Gemini, etc.) are not permitted.
✗Parameter cap enforced per track. Lightweight: ≤ 6B. Heavyweight: ≤ 36B. Total parameters count — not active (MoE) or effective (PLE/MatFormer). See full counting rules.
✗No tool use in Lightweight Track. Agentic architectures are Heavyweight-only.
✗No use of withheld test labels at any stage.

Allowed & Required

✓Fine-tuning on the provided training split (7,200 conversations) is permitted.
✓Dev set may be used freely for model selection and tuning.
✓System description paper required for all ranked submissions (due July 8, 2026). Author Instructions ↗
ℹOne submission per team per track. Teams receive test audio after submitting a system description by the deadline.
ℹExternal data is subject to the whitelist policy below. Proposals due May 4 May 11+1 wk.

Submission Format

ℹPlain-text SOAP note (see reference notes in training data for expected format).
ℹEach audio file must be processed independently — no cross-file context.

Approved Models & Datasets

The full rules document includes approved model and dataset lists, detailed parameter counting rules (MoE, PLE/MatFormer, omni-model stripping), and submission requirements. Additional models or datasets may be proposed for inclusion by May 4, 2026 May 11, 2026+1 wk — contact betrac@googlegroups.com.

📋 Team Registration

Ready to participate? Fill in the registration form to officially enroll your team.
Registration is required before submitting results. The form takes about 2 minutes to complete.

Questions & Registration

For questions or to register your team, contact betrac@googlegroups.com.

Dataset

Synth-DoPaCo

Fully synthetic doctor-patient conversations generated with open-weight, permissively licensed models. Speaker identities are strictly disjoint across splits. Audio features two speakers, 66 ambient sound classes, room reverberation, and Opus compression artifacts.

🤗 View on Hugging Face

Evaluation Metrics

Primary

Open Medical Concept F1

MeSH keyword matching + NER via scispaCy

⚙ btc-eval harness

Secondary

ROUGE F1

R-2, R-3, R-L against reference notes

⚙ btc-eval harness

Post-Competition Analysis (Top 5 per Track)

Top 5 systems per track will undergo additional LLM-as-a-judge evaluation (Faithfulness, Coverage, Structure, Conciseness) and out-of-domain evaluation on real recorded OSCE interviews.

Leaderboard

Rankings

Ranked by Open Medical Concept F1 · Lightweight Track (≤ 6B parameters, e2e only) Official Results

#	System	Pipeline	Concept F1 ↓	C-Prec	C-Recall	ROUGE-2	ROUGE-3	ROUGE-L	Words
1	TalTech	end-to-end	0.5429	0.5790	0.5177	0.3661	0.2497	0.4342	323
2	NTT-HI-CS	end-to-end	0.5397	0.5867	0.5069	0.3805	0.2646	0.4524	310
3	KUSLP	end-to-end	0.5152	0.5570	0.4882	0.3670	0.2529	0.4328	319
4	JYVA	end-to-end	0.5005	0.5430	0.4727	0.3513	0.2429	0.4120	323
5	KIT-ISL-AI4LT	end-to-end	0.4949	0.5459	0.4611	0.3601	0.2499	0.4323	291
6	DirectSense	end-to-end	0.4337	0.5410	0.3685	0.2487	0.1529	0.3315	241
7	ASLP	end-to-end	0.3965	0.3928	0.4134	0.2220	0.1342	0.3045	438
8	IASP	end-to-end	0.3616	0.4058	0.3354	0.1302	0.0799	0.1814	743
9	Qwen2.5-Omni-3B ↗ code	end-to-end	0.3089	0.343	0.295	0.116	0.050	0.189	817.4

* Qwen2.5-Omni-3B is the official e2e baseline. Test-set results submitted by teams via the challenge submission process.

Ranked by Open Medical Concept F1 · Heavyweight Track (≤ 36B parameters) Official Results

#	System	Pipeline	Concept F1 ↓	C-Prec	C-Recall	ROUGE-2	ROUGE-3	ROUGE-L	Words
1	TalTech	end-to-end	0.5625	0.6015	0.5361	0.4009	0.2804	0.4680	312
2	KUSLP	end-to-end	0.5441	0.5956	0.5090	0.3927	0.2771	0.4586	311
3	NTT-HI-CS	end-to-end	0.5389	0.5794	0.5111	0.3771	0.2614	0.4482	315
4	ASLP	end-to-end	0.5058	0.5035	0.5182	0.3405	0.2267	0.4146	366
5	Slate Lab	end-to-end	0.4754	0.5102	0.4671	0.3000	0.2056	0.3566	471
6	Qwen2.5-Omni-7B ↗ code	end-to-end	0.3261	0.379	0.296	0.140	0.061	0.224	448.2
7	Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct ↗ code	end-to-end	0.3178	0.267	0.403	0.146	0.064	0.231	563.1
8	Qwen2.5-Omni-3B ↗ code	end-to-end	0.3089	0.343	0.295	0.116	0.050	0.189	817.4
9	Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Thinking ↗ code	end-to-end	0.2854	0.239	0.363	0.133	0.055	0.219	509.8

* Qwen2.5-Omni / Qwen3-Omni variants are the official e2e baselines. Test-set results submitted by teams via the challenge submission process.

⚠ Reference Topline — Cascade Systems (not ranked) Cascade systems are ineligible for competition ranking and are shown for comparison only.

System	Pipeline	Concept F1	C-Prec	C-Recall	ROUGE-2	ROUGE-3	ROUGE-L	Words
Whisper-large-v3 ASR + Qwen3-30B-A3B ↗ code	cascade	0.2879	0.2964	0.2838	0.1174	0.0425	0.2243	261
Qwen3-ASR-1.7B + Qwen3-30B-A3B ↗ code	cascade	0.2811	0.2881	0.2741	0.1092	0.0374	0.2169	256